<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bellevue College Commons | Cara Diaconoff | Activity</title>
	<link>https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/members/cara-diaconoff/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/members/cara-diaconoff/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Cara Diaconoff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 06:14:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf0be15b9b393eec4dc8387f9480a2d3</guid>
				<title>Cara Diaconoff posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/wrussellpayne/2022/09/18/logical-fallacies/#comment-14</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:36:58 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explaining! Yes, I wasn&#8217;t sure if they were fallacies per se.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
				<a href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/members/wpayne/" rel="nofollow ugc">William Payne</a> wrote a new post on the site <a href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/wrussellpayne" rel="nofollow ugc">W. Russ Payne</a> 
Early on in the exploration of reasonableness we made a point of acknowledging basic human fallibility. Inquiry is not a linear path from absolute truth to [&hellip;]			]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d07b90ca292a074484a65be12283e9b1</guid>
				<title>Cara Diaconoff posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/wrussellpayne/2022/09/18/logical-fallacies/#comment-12</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:11:19 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to respond to your request for feedback! I enjoyed reading this post and think it&#8217;s clear. I mostly wondered if you might want to add examples under the climate and race discussions so as to acknowledge a still broader range of typical objections or questions raised by members of the general public.</p>
<p>Under climate, for example, we often&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-29501"><a href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/wrussellpayne/2022/09/18/logical-fallacies/#comment-12" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
				<a href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/members/wpayne/" rel="nofollow ugc">William Payne</a> wrote a new post on the site <a href="https://commons.bellevuecollege.edu/wrussellpayne" rel="nofollow ugc">W. Russ Payne</a> 
Early on in the exploration of reasonableness we made a point of acknowledging basic human fallibility. Inquiry is not a linear path from absolute truth to [&hellip;]			]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>